Abrasion and Friction in
Parallel-lay Rope Terminations.
Contents
List of Figures
List of Tables
Abstract
Nomenclature.
1 Introduction.
2 Parallel-lay ropes
2.1 Types of rope.
2.2 Uses of Parafil rope.
2.2.1 Resistance to corrosion.
2.2.2 Light weight.
2.3 Termination design.
2.3.1 Static failure.
2.3.2 Spike bed-down.
2.3.3 Cyclic fatigue.
2.4 Abrasion data for Parafil G ropes.
2.5 Summary.
3 Friction and abrasion of synthetic fibres.
3.1 Introduction.
3.2 Friction.
3.2.1 Classical friction.
3.2.2 Friction of polymers.
3.2.2.1 Summation of friction components.
3.2.2.2 Effect of spin finish on friction.
3.3 Kevlar-on-aluminium friction.
3.3.1 Measurement of yarn-on-capstan friction.
3.3.2 Apparatus.
Experimental equivalent coefficient of friction,
.
3.3.4 Experimental coefficients of friction,
A
and
.
3.3.4.1 Expressing
in terms of
A
and
.
3.4 Yarn-on-yarn friction for Kevlar 49.
3.5 Abrasion of polymeric fibres.
3.5.1 Experimental results on abrasion in the literature.
3.5.1.1 Mechanical abrasion.
3.5.1.2 Thermal failure.
3.6 Yarn-on-yarn abrasion.
3.7 Kevlar 49-on-aluminium abrasion.
3.7.1 Apparatus.
3.7.2 Contribution from the thickness to be abraded.
3.7.3 Contribution from the amplitude of cycling.
3.7.4 Overall lifetime equation.
3.8 Summary.
4 Anisotropy of synthetic fibres.
4.1 Introduction.
4.2 Elasticity in materials.
4.3 Published values for Kevlar.
4.3.1 Nomenclature used here.
4.3.2 Correlation of fibre and Abaqus parameters.
4.4 Transverse compression of a pad of fibres.
4.4.1 Sizing of rig.
4.4.2 Experimental set-up.
4.4.3 Observations.
4.4.3.1 Speed.
4.4.3.2 Calibration.
4.4.3.3 Plasticity.
4.4.3.4 Compression of a fibre to a rectangle using a finite element analysis.
4.4.3.5 Yield line analysis of a fibre compressing to a hexagon.
4.4.3.6 Young's modulus on first loading (Curve A).
4.4.3.7 Young's modulus on unloading-reloading (Curve B).
4.5 Values for use in the finite element model
4.6 Summary.
5 Finite element modelling of a parafil termination.
5.1 Introduction.
5.2 Alternatives to finite elements.
5.3 The finite element approach.
5.4 An Abaqus finite element analysis of a Parafil termination.
5.4.1 Introduction.
5.4.2 Geometry.
5.4.2.1 Spike.
5.4.2.2 Barrel.
5.4.2.3 Rope.
5.4.2.4 Interface elements.
5.4.2.5 Springs.
5.4.2.6 Mesh refinement.
5.4.3 Contact.
5.4.3.1 Gap elements INTER3A.
5.4.3.2 Interface element ISL22A and slide lines.
5.4.3.3 Pressure-clearance relationship.
5.4.4 Friction subroutine.
5.4.4.1 Elastic stick.
5.4.4.2 Slip.
5.4.5 Material subroutine.
5.4.5.1 Kevlar - orthotropic.
5.4.5.2 Orientation.
5.4.6 Verification of the subroutines.
5.4.7 Establishing contact.
5.4.7.1 Initial contact within the termination.
5.4.8 Loading history.
5.5 Summary.
6 Results from the finite element analysis.
6.1 Introduction.
6.2 Spike results.
6.2.1 Relative slip between the rope and the spike.
6.2.1.1 Description of the elastic slip - true slip graphs.
6.2.1.2 Behaviour from initial assembly to a preload of 60%, then unloaded.
6.2.1.3 Behaviour on cycling between 5% and 50%.
6.2.1.4 Behaviour on loading from 5% to failure.
6.2.2 Slip between the rope and the spike.
6.2.2.1 Cycling.
6.2.2.2 Behaviour on loading to 100%.
6.2.3 Contact force between the rope and the spike.
6.2.4 Force in the spike.
6.2.5 Stresses in the spike.
6.3 Contour plots of stress.
6.4 Barrel results.
6.4.1 Relative movement between the rope and the barrel.
6.4.2 Friction between the rope and the barrel.
6.4.3 Stresses in the barrel.
6.4.4 Force in the barrel.
6.5 Rope results.
6.5.1 Stresses in the rope.
6.5.1.1 Axial stress.
6.5.1.2 Shear stress.
6.6 Salient conclusions.
6.6.1 Modelling.
6.6.2 Observations.
6.6.2.1 First-loading.
6.6.2.2 Cycling the load.
7 Comparison between analysis and actual tests.
7.1 Introduction.
7.2 The strain gauging of a 60 tonne Parafil G termination.
7.3 Readings from the spike.
7.3.1 Nose of the spike, gauges 1
3.
7.3.2 Middle of the spike, gauges 4
9.
7.3.3 Base of the spike, gauges 10
12.
7.4 The barrel.
7.4.1 Middle of the barrel, gauges 13
24.
7.4.1.1 The behaviour in the middle of the barrel.
7.4.2 Base of the barrel, gauges 25
30.
7.5 Asymmetry within the termination.
7.5.1 Possible asymmetric distributions.
7.6 Displacements.
7.6.1 Bed-down.
7.6.2 Force-displacement.
7.7 Anomalous spike movement.
7.7.1 Limiting angle of friction.
7.7.1.1 Limiting contact pressure for 3.5
o
spike.
7.7.1.2 Limit on angle of spike.
7.7.2 Viscoelasticity.
7.8 Prediction of contact pressure using Lamé's equations.
7.9 Lifetimes under cyclic loading.
7.9.1 Predicted lifetimes for other size ropes.
7.10 Summary.
8 Discussion.
8.1 Improvements to the termination design.
8.1.1 Modifications to the geometry.
8.1.1.1 Adjusting the contact pressure.
8.1.1.2 Adjusting the radius of spike.
8.1.1.3 Improved spike design.
8.1.2 Materials.
8.1.2.1 Feasibility of non-metallic terminations.
8.1.2.2 Reduction in weight.
8.1.2.3 Improvement of lifetimes.
8.1.3 Prevention of anomalous spike movement.
8.1.3.1 Redesign.
8.1.3.2 Loading the spike.
8.2 Improvements to the finite element model.
8.2.1 Extend range.
8.2.1.1 Yield of aluminium.
8.2.2 Range of friction measurements.
8.2.3 Model yarn-on-yarn friction.
8.2.4 Yarn-on-yarn abrasion.
8.2.5 Hysteresis.
8.2.6 Viscoelasticity.
8.2.6.1 Transverse creep.
8.2.6.2 Axial creep.
8.2.7 Discretisation of the transverse loading curve.
8.2.7.1 Stress-strain at the nose.
8.2.8 Analysis of a partly abraded termination.
8.3 Asymmetry.
8.3.1 Future tests.
8.3.2 Mechanical assembly.
8.4 Summary.
9 Conclusions and recommendations.
Appendix A Factors affecting the gauge readings.
A.1 Contact pressure on gauges.
A.2 Elasticity of epoxy.
Appendix B Calculation of principal strains.
Appendix C Strains due to bending.
Appendix D Termination assembly.
References.
About this document ...